I gave up on it and went to other powder when the new powder was building much more tension and was slower compared to the aged things. I don't keep in mind if I even experimented with frequent h4831 or not; I'm imagining not.
H4831 will operate in the Swift although not real nicely. You'll hardly ever obtain the pressures you need for consistency Using the .223. 760, or H414 will probably be much better but for a few purpose I ain't the greatest admirer of most ball powders.
What is the primary difference? Compression. Without the Severe/weighty compression associated with the extended grain 7828, the stress curve was altered plus the load fell aside.
Minnesota H4831SC is my head over to within the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am saving the minor I have remaining for fall 2021. I would start out very low and work your way up, based on what load data you have a look at for this combo the min/max loads are everywhere in the board.
My working experience is that the SC and SSC loaded to the same fat because the very long Lower shows a reduced velocity.
I've made use of H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without any difference. The one thing will be the shorter Slash provides a bit more House. Great luck!gun)
I'm applying it having a 210 Berger. In my rifle, H1000 was not as correct. RL22 did very well but I was just a h4831 vs h4831sc little worried about temp steadiness. I think I'm at seventy two grains and have around 2850ish fps
It's possible you'll either: 1) Carry on and also have the objects mentioned below instantly faraway from your shopping cart:
Now applying IMR 4831 in a 300WSM, and h4831sc load data see the H4831sc is a popular option for this caliber and yields a bit more velocity. Besides it being quick Reduce, what exactly is the main difference in these two powders, and should I switch to H4831sc?
Why would I mention this? Exactly what is my place? I am undecided that there's a serious legitimate position aside from what's well known with most has not been well-liked with me at all in these situation. Do I just Have a very powder jinx or one thing? Just to tell you about how ridiculous I really am, tomorrow I am selection testing a mates new .
If there is no load data it really is mainly because this powder is just not suitable for this cartridge. Typically a person will never discover one particular powder to suit all cartridges, as well as the spouse and children of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you're inquiring about will not work. Click on to broaden...
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have a very constrained supply of Varget, along with a great deal more available H4831SC. I shoot fifty h4831sc five gr. loads Just about solely, simply because that's just what the rifles shoot the ideal.
I commonly normally receive the sc Variation. Employing a powder measure it hangs up much less as a result of shorter kernels and I believe permits much more constant metering so less time you are taking trickling in the final bit of charge for making body weight. So generally the SC will save you periods
The truth that the H4831 is in fact a slower burning powder is precisely why you happen to be looking at increased velocities attained with that powder, rather than what you've viewed with the IMR stuff.