This really is imagined to be the "visit" powder-or darn near it- for just about any bottle-necked cartridge 1 could handload. It is actually the muse for a great number of pet loads, but I have not been content with the final results.
H4831 will function in the Swift but not true very well. You'll never ever receive the pressures you will need for regularity Along with the .223. 760, or H414 will be much better but for some explanation I ain't the largest admirer of most ball powders.
This is amongst the greatest factors reloaders are admonished to utilize new data only; and to start out reduced anytime you receive a whole new number of powder. You do not really know (unless the organization informs you so) that your new wide range of powder was even manufactured at the exact same manufacturing facility as being the powder to procure a few years in the past.
I have had a couple of rifles that fouled actually negative. Receiving the many copper out was an actual PIA until eventually I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
INgunner54 said: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Uncovered a node and shot some groups.
I'm sure, tough occasions. H4831SC will certainly work, I just didn't like the case density when loaded lengthy. I don't bear in mind powder cost off the very best of my head but I used to be launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which is exactly where I generally goal for being. With your scenario using what you might have (and what I must have accomplished) I'd get started with the tip on the bearing floor on the bullet appropriate with the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there as soon as you discover a velocity node.
If there is not any load data it really is mainly because this powder is not ideal for this cartridge. Normally a person won't locate just one powder to suit all cartridges, as well as household of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you will be inquiring about won't do the job.
Im under the being familiar with I h4831 vs h4831sc need to use h4831sc. I have study that these powders are equivalent In addition to the shorter grain dimensions from the sc. Need to I even now be looking out for h4381sc?
You might either: one) Continue on and have the firearm(s) listed under instantly removed from your shopping cart:
The 55grs is all of that I shoot from my swift. Other manuals I think that they have slowed down the swift to show that their rifles are greater. It bug the hell out of me. I realize far better. That is why I don't ever toss out my older manuals. I h4831sc do obtain new manual on a regular basis to stay up on new chambers and there loading. I use this 39grs in summers @ a hundred+ levels with no troubles.
VERIFY YOUR AGE Selected states prohibit marketing or advertising h4831sc load data of firearms, ammunition, and relevant firearm components to minors. We’d like to ensure that you’re eighteen many years of age or more mature prior to allowing you to shop our site. Do you think you're 18 several years of age or older?
Like Anyone stated, the SC means “shorter Lower” and is particularly a little bit easier to meter. Would make you question why they would however make the regular a single.
Chances are you'll both: 1) Carry on and have the merchandise mentioned underneath mechanically removed from your buying cart:
I could stack em in one hole but I wasn’t pleased with the velocity. Soon after months, I received Blessed and caught some H1000 on the internet not to mention paid a little bit further. The very upcoming week at a gun show a guy experienced a whole situation of H1000 for $forty per 1lb. I forget about just how much, but Along with the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a mild load.